Recommended

Calif. bans travel to Idaho over laws banning boys in girls’ sports, sex on birth certificates

Hand holding a paper sheet with transgender symbol and equal sign inside.
Hand holding a paper sheet with transgender symbol and equal sign inside. | Getty

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra on Monday announced that state employees would soon be banned from taking publicly-funded trips to Idaho because of two recently passed laws that it deems as anti-transgender. 

Becerra invoked Assembly Bill 1887, a California law that took effect in 2017 and limits travel to states that it says have engaged in discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. 

At issue are Idaho’s House Bill 500 that mandates involvement in school sports be determined by biological sex rather than gender identity — meaning boys' who identify as female would be barred from competing in girls' sports — and HB 509 that prohibits a person from changing the biological sex on their birth certificate.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

“Where states legislate discrimination, California unambiguously speaks out. Let’s not beat around the bush: these laws are plain and simple discrimination,” Becerra said of the new travel ban that will go into effect on July 1. 

“The state of Idaho has taken drastic steps to undermine the rights of the transgender community, preventing people from playing sports in school or having documentation that reflects their identity.”

Idaho will join a list of 11 other states that California has banned travel to: Alabama, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas.

According to the California Office of the Attorney General, the travel ban will apply to all state agencies, authorities, boards, commissions, and departments, including those tied to the public university system of California.

Exceptions to the ban include matters such as enforcing California law, litigation, contractual obligations predating 2017, federal government requests, participation in grant funding or job-required training that cannot be obtained elsewhere, or for the protection of public health.

HB 500, which is also known as the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, has garnered criticism from progressives and the ACLU filed a lawsuit against it in April.

The Family Policy Alliance of Idaho, a conservative organization that supports the Idaho law, denounced both the move by California and the ACLU's lawsuit.

Blaine Conzatti, director of Advocacy for Family Policy Alliance of Idaho, noted in a statement that the efforts came right around the anniversary of the passages of federal Title IX legislation.

“California liberals and the ACLU are sending the message that female athletes who don’t want to compete against biological men are ‘bigoted’ and ‘intolerant,’” Conzatti said.

“In reality, they just want to compete in sports on a level playing field. This gaslighting of Idaho girls needs to stop. There is nothing discriminatory about laws that protect fair play and equal opportunities for female athletes.”

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.